1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 66 F.Supp.
  5. 66 F.Supp. 97 (1946)
 

BOWLES v. LEVY

Nos. 2786, 2785, 2787, 2788, 2824.

66 F.Supp. 97 (1946)

BOWLES, Adm'r, OPA, v. LEVY, and four other cases.

District Court, D. Oregon.

Supplemental Opinion June 10, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wm. B. Wetherall, Regional Chief, Food Enforcement Division, of San Francisco, Cal., and F. E. Wagner and James M. Blackford, Dist. Enforcement Attys., Cecelia P. Gallagher, Enforcement Atty., and Victor E. Harr and J. Robert Patterson, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Portland, Or., for the plaintiff.

Cake, Jaureguy & Tooze, of Portland, Or. (Herbert C. Hardy and Ralph H. Cake, both of Portland, Or., of counsel), for defendants.

McCOLLOCH, District Judge.

I accept the contention of defendants as proven that the regulation is unworkable in this area. It has been shown that violations are unavoidable. No evidence was offered to the contrary.

But the question remains whether I may deny OPA an injunction in any case where a regulation exists and violation of the regulation is shown. All of my instincts say that should not be enough, that the equities should be open to inquiry in every...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases