1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 67 F.Supp.
  5. 67 F.Supp. 955 (1946)
 

ILLINOIS PURE ALUMINUM CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 46084.

67 F.Supp. 955 (1946)

ILLINOIS PURE ALUMINUM CO. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

October 7, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest H. Oliver, of Washington, D. C. (Moyle and Wanlass, of Washington, D. C., and Poppenhusen, Johnston, Thompson and Raymond, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for plaintiff.

Armistead B. Rood, of Washington, D. C., and John F. Sonnett, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Before WHALEY, Chief Justice, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, JONES, and MADDEN, Judges.

JONES, Judge.

This suit involves the proper measure and amount of compensation to be paid to plaintiff for its stocks of aluminum materials requisitioned and taken by the defendant on May 20, 1942.

For many years plaintiff had been engaged in the business of manufacturing aluminum cooking utensils. With the outbreak of the war in Europe the need for aluminum greatly increased. Effort was made to increase the production of aluminum, and also orders were entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases