1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 61 F.Supp.
  5. 61 F.Supp. 647 (1945)
 

BOWLES v. MANCHESTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 1342.

61 F.Supp. 647 (1945)

BOWLES v. MANCHESTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 1, 1945.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Stephen Knight, District Enforcement Attorney, and Arnold M. Sweig, Enforcement Attorney Division of Rents and Services, Office of Price Administration, both of Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Jay E. Rubinow, of Manchester, Conn., for defendant.

SMITH, District Judge.

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum of Decision filed in Bowles v. Westbrook Defense Homes, D.C., 61 F.Supp. 172, the mandatory injunction sought by the plaintiff must be granted here.

The argument pressed by this defendant, that money retained in trust is not retained within the meaning of the regulation, is not persuasive. A trust relationship to the deposit must have been expected by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases