1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 61 F.Supp.
  5. 61 F.Supp. 436 (1945)
 

UNITED STATES v. ROYAL LOAN CO.

No. 3299.

61 F.Supp. 436 (1945)

UNITED STATES v. ROYAL LOAN CO. et al.

District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

June 27, 1945.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry C. Blanton, U. S. Atty., of Sikeston, Mo., and Russell Vandivort, Asst. U. S. Atty., of St. Louis, Mo. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Andrew D. Sharpe and Frank A. Michels, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., on the brief), for plaintiff.

Ben L. Shifrin and Taylor, Mayer, Shifrin & Willer, all of St. Louis, Mo., for defendants.

HULEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff by this action seeks to collect documentary stamp taxes from defendants, growing out of the issuance by the defendants of promissory notes. The case was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts and testimony, the latter being the opinion of brokers on the meaning of the term "corporate securities."

The defendant Royal Loan Company is the parent corporation of the other defendants. On January 16, 1940, the Royal Loan Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases