1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 56 F.Supp.
  5. 56 F.Supp. 696 (1944)
 

MODERN BROKERAGE CORP. v. MASSACHUSETTS B. & I. CO.

56 F.Supp. 696 (1944)

MODERN BROKERAGE CORPORATION v. MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INS. CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 20, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin C. Ribman, of New York City (Myron M. Fineman, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Bennett & Roth, of New York City (Ray Rood Allen and Herbert M. Lord, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

BRIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff's motion for a reargument, etc., is denied. Plaintiff prepared the contract for the repair of the vessel. If there was any ambiguity in its language, it would be construed against it. But there is no ambiguity in the arbitration clause. It clearly contemplates the arbitration of "any dispute * * * respecting the true construction of the specifications or respecting the manner or sufficiency of the performance of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases