1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 57 F.Supp.
  5. 57 F.Supp. 14 (1944)
 

DEFENSE PLANT CORP. v. UNITED STATES BARGE LINES

57 F.Supp. 14 (1944)

DEFENSE PLANT CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES BARGE LINES, Inc. (two cases).

District Court, S. D. New York.

Order Affirmed November 27, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City (F. Herbert Prem, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant Defense Plant Corporation.

Maurice A. Krisel, of New York City (Israel J. Beck, of Freeport, N. Y., of counsel), for intervenors Ida W. Barnes and Thomas C. Fisher.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City, for garnishee Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey.

Otterbourg, Steindler & Houston, of New York City (E. Robert Marks, of New York City, of counsel), for trustee in bankruptcy.

Order Affirmed November 27, 1944. See 145 F.2d 766.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

I think there are several reasons why the motion should not be granted. Two of these, each of which seems to me sufficient, will be stated.

I. On January 19 or 22, 1944, the respondent was adjudicated a bankrupt by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. At the time, so far as the papers disclose, no proceeding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases