1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 142 F.2d
  5. 142 F.2d 569 (1944)
 

SINCLAIR REFINING CO. v. COE

No. 8479.

142 F.2d 569 (1944)

SINCLAIR REFINING CO. v. COE, Commissioner of Patents.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia.

Decided May 1, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis D. Forward, member of the Bar of the Court of Appeals of the State of New York, of New York City, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Clarence M. Fisher, of Washington, D. C., and Raymond F. Adams, of New York City, were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. E. L. Reynolds, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. W. W. Cochran, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before MILLER, EDGERTON and ARNOLD, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

Even assuming, although not deciding, that this proceeding was properly brought under Section 4915, R.S.,1 we are satisfied, nevertheless, that the disputed claims were unpatentable over the prior art; hence that they were properly rejected by the Patent Office and by the District Court.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases