1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 55 F.Supp.
  5. 55 F.Supp. 13 (1944)
 

HOFFMAN v. RIVERSIDE & DAN RIVER COTTON MILLS

55 F.Supp. 13 (1944)

HOFFMAN v. RIVERSIDE & DAN RIVER COTTON MILLS, Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 16, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Krauss and Benjamin Levine, both of New York City, for plaintiff.

Burke & Burke, of New York City (John H. Schmid, of New York City, and Frank Talbott, Jr., of Danville, Va., of counsel), for defendant.

SYMES, District Judge. (Orally.)

This is an action by the plaintiff against the defendant, the manufacturer of a certain rayon cloth or textile fabric under the name of "Rivercool". The action is based on the anti-trust laws of the United States and alleges, in paragraph 10 of the complaint, that the defendants conspired together in 1942 and entered into a plan and scheme, the purpose of which was and is to completely monopolize...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases