1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 59 F.Supp.
  5. 59 F.Supp. 588 (1944)
 

BULLDOG ELECTRIC PRODUCTS CO. v. COLE ELEC. PROD. CO.

Civil Action No. 2726.

59 F.Supp. 588 (1944)

BULLDOG ELECTRIC PRODUCTS CO. v. COLE ELECTRIC PRODUCTS CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

December 20, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Hirsch and Dean, Fairbank & Hirsch, all of New York City (Daniel G. Cullen and Abraham J. Levin, both of Detroit, Mich., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Thomas J. Byrne and Cooper, Kerr & Dunham, all of New York City (Thomas J. Byrne and Victor S. Beam, both of New York City, and Ralph H. Swingle, of East Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for defendant Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The defendant Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company, hereinafter referred to as Westinghouse, has made a motion herein for summary judgment on its counterclaim adjudicating letters patent of the United States Patent Office, No. 2,285,770, to William H. Frank and Joseph A. Messing, owned by the plaintiff, Bulldog Electric Products Company, hereinafter referred to as Bulldog, as invalid and void.

The grounds of Westinghouse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases