1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 77 F.Supp.
  5. 77 F.Supp. 444 (1944)
 

LINCOLN ELECTRIC CO. v. KNOX

Civ. No. 21866.

77 F.Supp. 444 (1944)

LINCOLN ELECTRIC CO. v. KNOX et al.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Supplemental Opinion July 14, 1947.

Judgment Affirmed June 14, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Reese Dill, Thomas V. Koykka, Ashley M. Van Duzer, and McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and Charles Effinger Smoot, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen. of Washington, D. C., Peyton Ford and John F. Sonnett, Asst. Attys. Gen., and George M. Fay, U. S. Atty., and Melvin H. Siegel, Atty., Dept. of Justice, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, and BAILEY and GOLDSBOROUGH, District Judges.

Judgment Affirmed June 14, 1948. See 68 S.Ct. 1510.

PER CURIAM.

The case is now before us on a motion by defendants for summary judgment. The complaint of Lincoln Electric Company against Secretary Knox and Under-Secretary Forrestal was filed in this Court November 3, 1943. The main purpose was to obtain a decree that the Renegotiation Act in its form prior to the amendments of February 25, 1944, is unconstitutional and unenforceable. Defendants answered January...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases