1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 55 F.Supp.
  5. 55 F.Supp. 402 (1944)
 

LATROBE ELECTRIC STEEL CO. v. FANSTEEL METALLURGICAL CORPORATION

No. 363.

55 F.Supp. 402 (1944)

LATROBE ELECTRIC STEEL CO. v. FANSTEEL METALLURGICAL CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 31, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

White & Case, of New York City, (Thomas Kiernan, of New York City, and Walter J. Blenko, John C. Bane, Jr., and Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Abraham L. Bienstock, of New York City, (Don M. Peebles, of Chicago, Ill., and Jesse J. Holland and Sidney O. Friedman, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.

HULBERT, District Judge.

The motion is to dismiss this action in which the plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment.

Plaintiff is a Pennsylvania corporation. The defendant Fansteel is a New York corporation. Vascoloy-Ramet is a Delaware corporation, and is not within the jurisdiction of this court, and therefore may not be subjected to the jurisdiction of this court unless by its voluntary act.

It was conceded on the argument of the motion that all of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases