1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 55 F.Supp.
  5. 55 F.Supp. 347 (1944)
 

LATROBE ELECTRIC STEEL CO. v. VASCOLOY-RAMET CORP.

No. 363.

55 F.Supp. 347 (1944)

LATROBE ELECTRIC STEEL CO. v. VASCOLOY-RAMET CORPORATION et al.

District Court, D. Delaware.

April 13, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. S. Layton and R. H. Richards, Jr. (of Richards, Layton & Finger), both of Wilmington, Del., and Walter J. Blenko and John C. Bane, Jr. (of Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay), both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Daniel O. Hastings and John Van Brunt (of Hastings, Stockly and Layton), both of Wilmington, Del., and Don M. Peebles, of Chicago, Ill., and Jesse J. Holland, of New York City, for defendant Vascoloy-Ramet Corporation.

LEAHY, District Judge.

Vascoloy-Ramet Corporation, the Delaware defendant, moves under Rule 12(b) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for dismissal of the complaint. The basis of this suit is the federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, wherein plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that it has not and is not using any trade secrets of Vascoloy or of Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation, the New York defendant, in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases