1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 57 F.Supp.
  5. 57 F.Supp. 218 (1944)
 

ARNESEN v. MANHATTAN LIGHTERAGE CORPORATION

57 F.Supp. 218 (1944)

ARNESEN et al. v. MANHATTAN LIGHTERAGE CORPORATION. JOHNSON et al. v. SAME.

District Court, S. D. New York.

September 6, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abraham M. Fisch, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Herbert M. Lord, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

These are motions by the defendant for summary judgment. The actions are brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act and involve claims for overtime compensation and liquidated damages as provided for in Sec. 16 of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216.

For the purposes of these motions the defendant has conceded that the plaintiffs were at all times engaged in interstate commerce within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases