1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 56 F.Supp.
  5. 56 F.Supp. 159 (1944)
 

FORT WORTH & D. C. RY. CO. v. F. BURKART MFG. CO.

No. 619.

56 F.Supp. 159 (1944)

FORT WORTH & D. C. RY. CO. v. F. BURKART MFG. CO.

District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

July 18, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rassieur, Kammerer & Rassieur, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Lashly, Lashly, Miller & Clifford, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

HULEN, District Judge.

This cause was submitted on an agreed statement of facts. Defendant purchased 1,000 bales of cotton from one Pruden to be delivered F.O.B. St. Louis, payment to be made by sight draft. The bills of lading were made out to Pruden's order. Pruden and plaintiff as carrier entered into a conspiracy as a result of which the commodity was wrongfully labeled as cotton regins, instead of compressed and uncompressed cotton. Cotton regins travel at a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases