1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 57 F.Supp.
  5. 57 F.Supp. 134 (1944)
 

OTTO v. ORANGE SCREEN CO.

No. 2815.

57 F.Supp. 134 (1944)

OTTO v. ORANGE SCREEN CO.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

August 5, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur N. Klein, of Bayonne, N. J., and Leonard L. Kalish, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Smith & Slingerland, of Newark, N. J., for defendant.

FORMAN, District Judge.

Arthur L. Otto, plaintiff, and his assignor, A. L. Otto Company, entered into an agreement with Orange Screen Company, the defendant, on April 29, 1926, whereby the latter agreed to pay royalties on metallic screens which it manufactured and sold under a patent and certain inventions owned by plaintiff and his assignor for the life of the patent which expired in August of 1943. Royalty payments under this agreement were twenty cents per screen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases