1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 59 F.Supp.
  5. 59 F.Supp. 98 (1944)
 

WILLIAMS v. GREEN BAY & W. R. CO.

59 F.Supp. 98 (1944)

WILLIAMS et al. v. GREEN BAY & W. R. CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

August 1, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Unger & Pollack, of New York City (William F. Unger and Ludwig Mandel, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, of New York City (Merrill M. Manning and Walter Bruchhausen, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

The defendant has made two motions. One is to set aside service of the summons and complaint on the ground that the defendant (a Wisconsin corporation) is not doing business in New York. The other is to dismiss the complaint because there is lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter, which concerns the internal affairs of the defendant.

The motions were the last item on the calendar at my recent sitting in the motion part. I was compelled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases