1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 56 F.Supp.
  5. 56 F.Supp. 48 (1944)
 

BRUSICH v. GRACE LINE

56 F.Supp. 48 (1944)

BRUSICH v. GRACE LINE, Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 6, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob Rassner, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City (Walter X. Connor, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves for two things. One is to strike out the answer. The other is to strike out the third defense (paragraphs 16 to 21) of the answer, referred to in the notice of motion as "the defense of compensation."

I discover no ground for eliminating the answer in its entirety; nor has any been suggested. The sole matter for discussion, therefore, is the third defense.

The issue turns on Section 33 of the Longshoremen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases