PER CURIAM.
The court has given full consideration to the relief to be accorded in this case, and the views of its members upon certain of the questions arising in this connection have been expressed heretofore.
55 F.Supp. 985 (1944)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. The PULLMAN COMPANY et al., Defendants.
District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 8, 1944.
May 8, 1944.
Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., Thurman Arnold, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Gleeson, U. S. Atty., of Philadelphia, Pa., Fowler Hamilton, Frank Coleman, Wm. L. McGovern, and Wilber Stammler, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Joseph McDowell and Paul Fitting, Sp. Attys., both of Washington, D C., for plaintiff.
Ralph M. Shaw, of Chicago, Ill., George Wharton Pepper, of Philadelphia, Pa., Seth W. Richardson, of Washington, D. C., Walter H. Jacobs, Lowell M. Greenlaw, and Guy A. Gladson, all of Chicago, Ill., Adrien F. Busick, of Washington, D. C., Winston, Strawn & Shaw, of Chicago, Ill., Davies, Richberg, Beebe, Busick & Richardson, of Washington, D. C., and Pepper, Bodine, Stokes & Schoch, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.
Before BIGGS, MARIS, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The court has given full consideration to the relief to be accorded in this case, and the views of its members upon certain of the questions arising in this connection have been expressed heretofore.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.