1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 48 F.Supp.
  5. 48 F.Supp. 917 (1943)
 

MULCAHY v. WHITEHILL

Civ. A. No. 2147.

48 F.Supp. 917 (1943)

MULCAHY et al. v. WHITEHILL.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

March 2, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Goodwin and Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Walter F. Coleman and Ropes, Gray, Best, Coolidge & Rugg, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

HEALEY, District Judge.

This is an action upon a judgment of the Supreme Court of New York for the plaintiffs in the sum of $5,985.28 plus costs of $150, totalling $6,135.28.

The material facts are not disputed. Five of the plaintiffs are domiciliaries of the Argentine Republic and the other of the State of New York. The defendant is a resident and domiciliary of Massachusetts. The plaintiffs and the defendant entered a contract whereby the plaintiffs agreed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases