1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 52 F.Supp.
  5. 52 F.Supp. 884 (1943)
 

CROSLEY CORP. v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MFG. CO.

No. 1524.

52 F.Supp. 884 (1943)

CROSLEY CORPORATION v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MFG. CO.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

As Corrected January 25, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel E. Darby, Jr. and Floyd H. Crews, both of New York City, Alden D. Redfield, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Christy, Parmelee & Strickland, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Brown, Critchlow & Flick and Jo. Baily Brown, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., Victor S. Beam, of New York City, Carl S. Lloyd, of Chicago, Ill., and W. Melville Van Sciver, of Lester, Pa., for defendant.

GIBSON, District Judge.

The court, after hearing and consideration, makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

Findings of Fact

General

1. This suit involves eighteen patents, relating to electric refrigeration, which are owned by the defendant-counterclaimant, Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company, a corporation of the State of Pennsylvania (hereinafter referred to as "defendant", or as "Westinghouse"). Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases