1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 48 F.Supp.
  5. 48 F.Supp. 827 (1943)
 

LEE v. CONGRESS BEAUTY EQUIPMENT CO.

No. 928.

48 F.Supp. 827 (1943)

LEE v. CONGRESS BEAUTY EQUIPMENT CO.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

January 5, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harrison F. Lyman and Charles E. Hammett, Jr., both of Boston, Mass. (Fish, Richardson & Neave, of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Robert J. Keating, of Boston, Mass. (Roberts, Cushman & Woodberry and Samuel J. Weiner, all of Boston, Mass., and Maurice S. Cayne, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for defendant.

WYZANSKI, District Judge.

Findings of Fact.

A. Nature of the Case.

1. This is a suit for infringement of Reed patent No. 1,978,388 for a heat producing composition and method of chemically generating heat. Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 10 are in suit.

2. Plaintiff is the assignee of the patent. Defendant is the seller of certain hair waving pads known as "Windsor" and "Park Avenue" pads. For the purposes of this case there is no difference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases