1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 50 F.Supp.
  5. 50 F.Supp. 798 (1943)
 

UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS CO. v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO.

No. 1961.

50 F.Supp. 798 (1943)

UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS CO., Inc., v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO.

District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

May 24, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harness, Dickey & Pierce, of Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff.

Virgil E. Woodcock, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Edwin J. Balluff, of Detroit, Mich., of counsel), for defendant.

LEDERLE, District Judge.

Findings of Fact.

1. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States and the complaint and supplemental complaint allege infringement with respect to the following United States patents: No. 1,921,274, issued to plaintiff as assignee of the applicant Archibald A. Warner; No. 1,987,678, issued to plaintiff as assignee of applicants Paul B. Goddard and Frank Ketcham. Plaintiff Universal Products Company, Inc., is a corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases