COXE, District Judge.
I think this case can be determined solely on the fact issue. The most that the plaintiff claims is that the supplemental contract of September 30, 1932, gave the plaintiff protection against the commercial use by the defendant of any part of the plaintiff's process. This contract was terminated on November 28, 1934, and it is not disputed that all payments according to the terms of the contract were made to the plaintiff up to that time.
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.