STUMPF v. PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO.

Nos. 1501-1503.

51 F.Supp. 555 (1943)

STUMPF v. PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO. et al. THOMPSON v. SAME. DUBBERT v. SAME.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.

September 9, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cowgill & Popham, of Kansas City, Mo., and Wm. Anderson and Crouch & Crouch, all of Harrisonville, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Johnson & Davis and Alfred Kuraner, all of Kansas City, Mo., and Ray Shubert, of Harrisonville, Mo., for defendants.


REEVES, District Judge.

The non-resident corporate defendant insists that this court has jurisdiction on two grounds: (a) Upon the face of the complaints a separable controversy between the plaintiffs and the non-resident defendant is stated; (b) if a joint cause of action be stated in the complaints, then such averments are fraudulently made for the purpose of defeating the jurisdiction of this court.

The case has been ably argued by counsel for both parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases