1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 52 F.Supp.
  5. 52 F.Supp. 414 (1943)
 

DUBAC v. M. & G. CONVOY, INC.

Civil Action No. 1872.

52 F.Supp. 414 (1943)

DUBAC v. M. & G. CONVOY, Inc.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

October 27, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wolf, McDonald, Graham & Ingram, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Leo A. Nunnink, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

McVICAR, District Judge.

This is an action to recover damages resulting from a collision between an automobile and a truck at the intersection of two streets. The verdict was for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,600. Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial on the ground of inadequacy of the verdict. He has since stated, by his attorney, that he does not desire to prosecute the motion further. Defendant filed a motion to have the verdict and judgment set aside and for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases