1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 50 F.Supp.
  5. 50 F.Supp. 289 (1943)
 

ARON v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Civil Action No. 3127.

50 F.Supp. 289 (1943)

ARON et al. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

May 17, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur S. Salus and Nathan Lavine, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Gerald A. Gleeson, U. S. Atty., of Philadelphia, Pa., and W. T. Kelley, Chief Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, and Cyrus B. Austin, Sp. Atty., Federal Trade Commission, both of Washington, D. C., for defendants.

KALODNER, District Judge.

The issue here is as to whether this court has jurisdiction to enjoin the holding of hearings and the taking of testimony in a proceeding before the Federal Trade Commission.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows:

On or about August 10, 1942, the Federal Trade Commission instituted proceedings against the plaintiffs. The Commission's complaint charged the plaintiffs with engaging in unfair acts and practices in commerce...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases