1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 51 F.Supp.
  5. 51 F.Supp. 958 (1943)
 

JERSEY CITY DRY DOCKS CO. v. O'BRIEN BROS.

No. 16694.

51 F.Supp. 958 (1943)

JERSEY CITY DRY DOCKS CO. v. O'BRIEN BROS., Inc.

District Court, E. D. New York.

August 7, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mahar & Mason and Frank C. Mason, both of New York City, for libellant.

Foley & Martin and Christopher E. Heckman, all of New York City, for respondent O'Brien Bros., Inc.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper and Frederic Conger, all of New York City, for Tice Towing Line, Inc., claimant of Tug Cardinal.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The tug Cardinal was impleaded under the 56th Rule in Admiralty, 28 U.S.C.A. § 723, on the petition of the respondent O'Brien Brothers, Inc.

Prior to June 1, 1942, the libellant and respondent entered into a contract for towage wherein and whereby, for a consideration, the respondent contracted to have libellant's Dry Dock No. 1 towed from one point in the yard located at the foot of Henderson Street, Jersey City, to the permanent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases