1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 48 F.Supp.
  5. 48 F.Supp. 961 (1943)
 

ARNDT v. BANK OF AMERICA

No. 22325.

48 F.Supp. 961 (1943)

ARNDT et al. v. BANK OF AMERICA et al.

District Court. N. D. California, S. D.

February 15, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bryce Swartfager, of Santa Rosa, Cal., for plaintiffs.

G. D. Schilling and R. I. McCarthy, both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

GOODMAN, District Judge.

On motion to dismiss plaintiffs' first amended complaint, defendants claim lack of Federal jurisdiction for the following reasons:

a. The amount in controversy is less than $3,000 exclusive of interest and costs.

b. Absence of subject matter of jurisdictional character.

c. Noncompliance with Rule 8(a) (1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c.

The amended complaint alleges in substance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases