1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 47 F.Supp.
  5. 47 F.Supp. 897 (1942)
 

E. W. BLISS CO. v. COLD METAL PROCESS CO.

No. 5402.

47 F.Supp. 897 (1942)

E. W. BLISS CO. v. COLD METAL PROCESS CO.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Supplemental Opinion October 27, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. M. Kent (of Kwis, Hudson & Kent), of Cleveland, Ohio, and Fraser, Myers & Manley, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Baker, Hostetler & Patterson and Howard Burns, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and Stebbins, Blenko & Parmelee, Walter J. Blenko, and William H. Webb, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

WILKIN, District Judge.

This case was heard on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The reason assigned for the motion was that defendant's patent 1,779,195 (referred to in the briefs and in this memorandum as '195) is invalid for two reasons: (1) That certain essential features of the division patent were not disclosed in the original application and that therefore as matter of law the patent is not entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the original application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases