IN RE EWALD

Patent Appeal No. 4588.

126 F.2d 486 (1942)

In re EWALD.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 23, 1942.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cox, Moore & Olson, of Chicago, Ill. (Ballard Moore and Curtis F. Prangley, both of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellant.

W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C. (E. L. Reynolds, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Presiding Judge.

There is here brought before us for review the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner rejecting two claims embraced in appellant's application for patent entitled "For Fruit Bobbing Apparatus." Twenty-seven claims embraced in the application were allowed by the examiner. Those claims were not involved in the appeal to the board, nor are they involved here. The two rejected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases