1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 45 F.Supp.
  5. 45 F.Supp. 451 (1942)
 

MacBRYDE v. BURNETT

Civ. No. 1137.

45 F.Supp. 451 (1942)

MacBRYDE v. BURNETT et al.

District Court, D. Maryland.

June 9, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Morfit Mullen and R. Contee Rose, both of Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

Edwin F. A. Morgan, Frederick W. Brune, and Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, all of Baltimore, Md., for estate of Robert B. Parker.

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The remaining question in this case is the proper division of the fund in court among three several claimants. Questions of jurisdiction and procedure have been heretofore considered and ruled upon (D. C., 41 F.Supp. 661) and the amount of the fund has been determined after hearing on the merits of the main controversy. D.C., 44 F.Supp. 833.

The fund was originally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases