1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 45 F.Supp.
  5. 45 F.Supp. 360 (1942)
 

AUSTRAL SALES CORPORATION v. JAMESTOWN METAL EQUIPMENT CO.

No. 2010.

45 F.Supp. 360 (1942)

AUSTRAL SALES CORPORATION v. JAMESTOWN METAL EQUIPMENT CO., Inc.

District Court, W. D. New York.

May 4, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bohleber, Fassett & Montstream, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Rogerson, Clary & Hewes, of Jamestown, N. Y. (Austin & Seabury, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This matter comes before me on the question of the amount of the royalty to which the plaintiff is entitled as damages. This suit is for patent infringement. There was a consent decree. There was a single sale in which the defendant infringed. Plaintiff's patents in suit generally relate to metalic school wardrobes and the means for mounting their doors for movement and locking mechanism.

The actual selling price of the wardrobe was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases