1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 48 F.Supp.
  5. 48 F.Supp. 74 (1942)
 

PANZRAM v. O'DONNELL

Civ. Nos. 149, 150.

48 F.Supp. 74 (1942)

PANZRAM v. O'DONNELL (two cases).

District Court, D. Minnesota, S. D.

December 23, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moonan & Moonan, of Waseca, Minn., for defendant in support of said motion.

Schmitt, Johnson & Farrish, of Mankato, Minn., for plaintiffs in opposition thereto.

NORDBYE, District Judge.

Defendant's motions are based principally on these grounds: That Sections 170.05 and 542.09 of the Laws of Minnesota for 1941 violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution of the United States, Amend. 14, and impose an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce.

Defendant is a resident of the State of Wisconsin. On June 7, 1942, an automobile driven by him collided with a car driven by Herman Panzram on a highway in Olmsted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases