UNITED STATES v. BELMONT


41 F.Supp. 943 (1941)

UNITED STATES v. BELMONT et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

September 15, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mathias F. Correa, of New York City (Irvin C. Rutter and Noel Hemmendinger, both of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Samson Selig, of New York City (Samson Selig, Abraham J. Multer, and Morris Katz, all of New York City, of counsel), for impleaded defendant.


CONGER, District Judge.

Crews, as receiver of the Petrograd Metal Works, moves to dismiss this action, in which he is an impleaded defendant, upon the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter involved herein. The facts regarding this litigation are fully set forth in United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324, 57 S.Ct. 758, 81 L.Ed. 1134. The Supreme Court therein sustained the sufficiency of the complaint as against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases