1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 39 F.Supp.
  5. 39 F.Supp. 795 (1941)
 

SMITH v. NICHOLSON TRANSIT CO.

No. 2116.

39 F.Supp. 795 (1941)

SMITH et al. v. NICHOLSON TRANSIT CO. et al.

District Court, W. D. New York.

April 25, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown, Ely & Richards, of Buffalo, N. Y., and Mahar & Mason, of New York City (Laurence E. Coffey, of Buffalo, N. Y., and Frank C. Mason, of New York City, of counsel), for libellants.

Hill, Hamblen, Essery & Lewis, of Detroit, Mich., Sanders, Hamilton, Dobmeier, Connelly & McMahon of Buffalo, N. Y., for respondents Nicholson Transit Co., and Steamer Tampico.

Hagen & Eidenbach, of New York City, Campbell & Campbell of Buffalo, N. Y., (Henry C. Eidenbach, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent-impleaded.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This libel was filed against the steamer Tampico by Eustis R. Smith and James Baldwin, owners of the barges William E. Hanley and Margaret A. Hanley. The Nicholson Transit Company, owner of the Tampico, agreed to transport a cargo of steel ingots from Cleveland to New York City. When the Tampico arrived at Buffalo, the cargo was loaded upon barges. The Margaret A. Hanley and the William E. Hanley were two of the barges receiving part of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases