1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 39 F.Supp.
  5. 39 F.Supp. 775 (1941)
 

HAZELTINE CORPORATION v. CROSLEY CORPORATION

No. 183.

39 F.Supp. 775 (1941)

HAZELTINE CORPORATION v. CROSLEY CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

July 2, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marechal & Noe, of Dayton, Ohio (Laurence B. Dodds and Henry T. Kilburn, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Alden D. Redfield and Allen & Allen, all of Cincinnati, Ohio (Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and Floyd H. Crews, of Darby & Darby, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

DRUFFEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action charging infringement by defendant of two MacDonald Patents, No. 1,913,604 (claims 1, 6, and 8), and No. 2,022,514 (claims 5, 22, 24 and 25), the former being a division of the latter, and are directed to the antenna circuit of radio receivers.

Defendant denies infringement, and challenges the validity of the patents, alleging: The claims are broader than the invention; the claims are not supported by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases