1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 40 F.Supp.
  5. 40 F.Supp. 748 (1941)
 

ALEXANDER YOUNG DISTILLING CO. v. NATIONAL D. PROD. CORP.

No. 688.

40 F.Supp. 748 (1941)

ALEXANDER YOUNG DISTILLING CO. v. NATIONAL DISTILLERS PRODUCTS CORPORATION.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

September 8, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mayer, Magaziner & Brunswick, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Richards & Murray, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Breed, Abbott & Morgan, of New York City (W. Heyward Myers, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., and Gerald J. Craugh, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

KALODNER, District Judge.

This is a trademark infringement and unfair competition suit, tried before me without a jury. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation, owns a valid and subsisting trademark, Y.P.M., which it uses in connection with its manufacture, sale and distribution of whiskey; and that the defendant, a Virginia corporation, uses a trademark PM in connection with its manufacture, sale and distribution of an identical product...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases