DETACHABLE BIT CO. v. TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING CO.

No. 5761.

41 F.Supp. 37 (1941)

DETACHABLE BIT CO. v. TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING CO.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

July 31, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Brown Morton and H. Stanley Mansfield (of Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds), both of New York City, and Hull, Brock & West, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

John G. Ketterer (of Lynch, Day, Pontius & Lynch), of Canton, Ohio, Luther Day (of Jones, Day, Cockley & Reavis), of Cleveland, Ohio, and Joseph J. Gravely (of Carr, Carr, & Gravely), of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.


WILKIN, District Judge.

This case is based upon two separate causes of action, referred to by counsel as the equity action and the patent action. There is no reason for a lengthy or discursive opinion. The issues have been thoroughly analyzed and the law clearly presented in thorough briefs. In disposing of the case the court need do no more than indicate its findings and rulings.

Equity Action.

This cause of action was based upon the allegations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases