1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 43 F.Supp.
  5. 43 F.Supp. 665 (1941)
 

SANFORD INV. CO. v. ENTERPRISE WHEEL & CAR CORP.

Civ. A. No. 18.

43 F.Supp. 665 (1941)

SANFORD INV. CO. v. ENTERPRISE WHEEL & CAR CORPORATION.

District Court, W. D. Virginia, at Abingdon.

December 1, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Hodges, of Washington, D. C., and William A. Stuart, of Abingdon, Va., for plaintiff.

Gilbert P. Ritter (of Ritter, Mechlin & Muir), of Washington, D. C., and Floyd H. Roberts, of Bristol, Va., for defendant.

BARKSDALE, District Judge.

Probably the most distinguishing characteristic of this case is its prolixity. This is not particularly surprising when it is noted that the four patents in suit contain an aggregate of 500 claims. And all this verbiage is used to claim improvements in the simple structure, which Judge Soper, in another case, described as follows: "The mine cars referred to are small railroad cars with four straight sides or walls forming a rectangular box...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases