1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 39 F.Supp.
  5. 39 F.Supp. 19 (1941)
 

HENJES v. ÆTNA INS. CO.

No. 1953.

39 F.Supp. 19 (1941)

HENJES v. ÆTNA INS. CO. et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

May 5, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Donoghue, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City (Henry J. Bogatko, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants Hartford Fire Ins. Co. and others.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the defendants, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Connecticut Fire Insurance Company and Universal Insurance Company for the following relief: "Why an order should not be entered herein:

"a. declaring null and void the plaintiff's ex parte order of the New York Supreme Court, Kings County, dated the 14th day of April, 1941, discontinuing without prejudice the above entitled action as against the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases