1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 40 F.Supp.
  5. 40 F.Supp. 522 (1941)
 

MAITLAND v. C. D. MALLORY & CO.

40 F.Supp. 522 (1941)

MAITLAND v. C. D. MALLORY & CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 22, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Haight, Griffin, Deming & Gardner, of New York City, (David L. Corbin, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City (Raymond Parker, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

Defendants have moved for dismissal of the complaint on the ground of improper venue. This is an action at law under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688. It is provided therein that such an action must be brought in the district where the employer has its residence or principal office.

Mallory & Co., one of the defendants, has conceded that the motion must be denied as to it, and has agreed that the venue, insofar as it is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases