1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 36 F.Supp.
  5. 36 F.Supp. 470 (1941)
 

BROCKWAY GLASS CO. v. HARTFORD-EMPIRE CO.

No. 387.

36 F.Supp. 470 (1941)

BROCKWAY GLASS CO., Inc., v. HARTFORD-EMPIRE CO. et al.

District Court, W. D. New York.

January 10, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saperston, McNaughtan & Saperston of Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Slee, O'Brien, Hellings & Ulsh, of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant Hartford-Empire Co.

Kenefick, Cooke, Mitchell, Bass & Letchworth, of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant Hazel-Atlas Glass Co.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Three several motions by the plaintiff are here under consideration. In order to determine these, it is necessary to have an understanding of the issues in the suit at bar.

During and prior to 1928, defendant herein, Hartford-Empire Company (hereinafter called Hartford) was engaged in a patent infringement litigation with defendant herein Hazel-Atlas Glass Company (hereinafter called Hazel) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Kearns-Gorsuch...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases