1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 40 F.Supp.
  5. 40 F.Supp. 386 (1941)
 

AERO SPARK PLUG CO. v. B. G. CORPORATION

40 F.Supp. 386 (1941)

AERO SPARK PLUG CO., Inc., et al. v. B. G. CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 14, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emery, Varney, Whittemore & Dix, of New York City (Lucius E. Varney and Nichol M. Sandoe, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Harry A. Yerkes, Jr., of New York City (Lee B. Kemon, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for defendant.

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This is a suit for infringement of United States Patent #1,958,580 which relates to spark plugs. As stated in the opening paragraph of the patent "the object of the invention is to improve the spark at the proper gap through the elimination of parasitic discharges and leakages of the ignition current". The patent was applied for on July 17, 1931 by Armen A. Kasarjian who, simultaneously with the execution of his application for said patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases