1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 39 F.Supp.
  5. 39 F.Supp. 328 (1941)
 

HASTINGS MFG. CO. v. REED & WILEY CO.

No. 82.

39 F.Supp. 328 (1941)

HASTINGS MFG. CO. v. REED & WILEY CO.

District Court, W. D. Michigan, S. D.

May 5, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl & Chappell, of Kalamazoo, Mich., for plaintiff.

William Cyrus Rice, of Grand Rapids, Mich. (John H. Sutherland and S. H. Hartz, both of St. Louis, Mo., of counsel), for defendant.

RAYMOND, District Judge.

Findings of Fact.

1. The plaintiff is a Michigan corporation having its principal place of business at Hastings, Michigan.

2. The defendants Charles L. Reed and Carl W. Wiley are members forming a co-partnership doing business as Reed & Wiley Company, with a regular and established place of business at Grand Rapids, Michigan.

3. The plaintiff is, and was at the time of filing the complaint herein, the owner of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases