1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 39 F.Supp.
  5. 39 F.Supp. 283 (1941)
 

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COM'N v. CHICAGO FOOD MFRS. P. C. G.

No. 2132.

39 F.Supp. 283 (1941)

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. CHICAGO FOOD MFRS. POOL CAR GROUP et al.

District Court, N. D. Illinois.

April 10, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colin A. Smith and Hugh E. Lillie, both of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, of Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

SULLIVAN, District Judge.

The question before me is whether, under the present facts, Baxter or any member of the Big Ten is a "broker" as that term is defined in 49 U.S.C.A. § 303(a) (18) of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, dealing with motor transport, and which provides: "The term `broker' means any person not included in the term `motor carrier' and not a bona fide employee or agent of any such carrier, who or which, as principal or agent, sells or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases