1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 38 F.Supp.
  5. 38 F.Supp. 260 (1941)
 

NATIONAL RUBBER MACHINERY CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 42614.

38 F.Supp. 260 (1941)

NATIONAL RUBBER MACHINERY CO. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

April 7, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hamel, Park & Saunders, of Washington, D. C. (Charles D. Hamel and Lee I. Park, both of Washington, D. C., Lloyd G. Wilson, of New York City, and C. F. Rothenburg, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff.

John W. Husey, of Washington, D. C., and Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. (Robert A. Anderson and Fred K. Dyar, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for defendant.

Before WHALEY, Chief Justice, and WHITAKER, LITTLETON, MADDEN, and JONES, Judges.

WHITAKER, Judge.

The question in this case is the proper basis for the computation of depreciation on certain assets acquired by the plaintiff from the Akron Rubber Mold & Machine Company, DeMattia Brothers, Inc., and De Mattia Foundry & Machine Company.

These assets were acquired under these circumstances: In the early part of 1928 one Francis Quinn approached each of the three above companies, and also the Banner Machine Company and the Kuhlke Machine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases