1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 38 F.Supp.
  5. 38 F.Supp. 232 (1941)
 

PESCI v. F. A. VIESER & SON

No. E-5903.

38 F.Supp. 232 (1941)

PESCI et al. v. F. A. VIESER & SON, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

January 31, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Boyle & Archer, Frederick P. Greiner, both of Camden, N. J. (F. De Witt Goodwin, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Albert B. Melnik, of Camden, N. J. (Caroline K. Kenworthy and Harry Langsam, both of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for defendant.

AVIS, District Judge.

A patent suit involving the following facts:

(1) The patent was issued to plaintiff Thomas Pesci on May 11, 1937 in pursuance of an application filed by patentee on May 28, 1936, patent No. 2,079,870. The patent relates to improvements in blocks used for printing linoleum and other floor coverings.

(2) The method of preparation is to construct a nonwarpable block of four laminated wooden materials of a total thickness of about...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases