1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 40 F.Supp.
  5. 40 F.Supp. 216 (1941)
 

WHITE v. LOMBARDY DRESSES

40 F.Supp. 216 (1941)

WHITE et al. v. LOMBARDY DRESSES, Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 8, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Sonnenreich, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Mendes, Krisel & Lessall, of New York City (Herman Mendes and W. Lee Helms, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

INCH, District Judge.

These actions all relate to dress patents. In case 8-41, Letters Patent No. 117,527. In case 10-138, Letters Patents Nos. 121,448, 121,542, and 121,660. In case 10-413, Letters Patent No. 121,554. In case 10-486, Letters Patent No. 121,984. They were all tried together. The issue in each action is whether or not plaintiff was the owner of a valid design patent and if so whether that patent had been infringed by defendant.

By arrangement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases