1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 42 F.Supp.
  5. 42 F.Supp. 140 (1941)
 

STEWART-WARNER CORPORATION v. STALEY

No. 3342.

42 F.Supp. 140 (1941)

STEWART-WARNER CORPORATION v. STALEY.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

November 21, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Bollinger and Smith, Buchanan & Ingersoll, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Williams, Bradbury & Hinkle, Warren C. Horton and A. C. Ahlberg, all of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Elder W. Marshall and Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Leonard L. Kalish, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

The original defendant in this case, Universal Lubricating Systems, Inc., filed a motion on April 1, 1941, for leave to file an amended counterclaim herein. On May 8, 1941, the plaintiff filed a motion to strike the defendant's amended counterclaim, and to dismiss it. The case then came on to be heard on June 9, 1941, at which time this court heard the motion to file this amended counterclaim, and allowed it to be filed nunc pro tunc as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases