1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 38 F.Supp.
  5. 38 F.Supp. 91 (1941)
 

SMART v. COE

No. 4245.

38 F.Supp. 91 (1941)

SMART et al. v. COE, Commissioner of Patents.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

February 14, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley E. Ross, of Detroit, Mich., and John G. Sbarbaro, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

W. W. Cochran, Sol. of Patent Office, of Washington, D. C. (Harry S. Mackey, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for defendant.

BAILEY, Associate Justice.

Findings of Fact.

1. The present action, brought under the provisions of Section 4915, Revised Statutes, U.S.C.A. Title 35, Section 63, involves an application for patent filed by the plaintiff Clarence F. Smart on October 4, 1935, Serial No. 43,468, and duly assigned to the plaintiff General Motors Corporation. The complaint as filed presented claims 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, 32 and 33 of this application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases